last sync: 2025-May-01 19:36:43 UTC

Kubernetes cluster containers should only use allowed AppArmor profiles

Azure BuiltIn Policy definition

Source Azure Portal
Display name Kubernetes cluster containers should only use allowed AppArmor profiles
Id 511f5417-5d12-434d-ab2e-816901e72a5e
Version 6.2.0
Details on versioning
Versioning Versions supported for Versioning: 2
6.2.0
6.1.1
Built-in Versioning [Preview]
Category Kubernetes
Microsoft Learn
Description Containers should only use allowed AppArmor profiles in a Kubernetes cluster. This policy is generally available for Kubernetes Service (AKS), and preview for Azure Arc enabled Kubernetes. For more information, see https://aka.ms/kubepolicydoc.
Cloud environments AzureCloud = true
AzureUSGovernment = true
AzureChinaCloud = unknown
Available in AzUSGov The Policy is available in AzureUSGovernment cloud. Version: '7.1.1'
Repository: Azure-Policy 511f5417-5d12-434d-ab2e-816901e72a5e
Assessment(s) Assessments count: 1
Assessment Id: 86f91051-9d6a-47c3-a07f-bd14cb214b45
DisplayName: Containers should only use allowed AppArmor profiles
Description: Containers running on Kubernetes clusters should be limited to allowed AppArmor profiles only.
;AppArmor (Application Armor) is a Linux security module that protects an operating system and its applications from security threats. To use it, a system administrator associates an AppArmor security profile with each program.
Remediation description:
1. Ensure a list of AppArmor profiles containers are allowed to use is configured, via the security policy parameter 'Allowed AppArmor profiles'.
2. From the Unhealthy resources tab, select the cluster. Defender for Cloud lists the running pods with AppArmor profile violating the configured list.
3. Update AppArmor annotation in the Pod's metadata and redeploy the pod with the updated spec.
Categories: Container
Severity: High
Mode Microsoft.Kubernetes.Data
Type BuiltIn
Preview False
Deprecated False
Effect Default
Audit
Allowed
audit, Audit, deny, Deny, disabled, Disabled
RBAC role(s) none
Rule aliases none
Rule resource types IF (2)
Compliance
The following 36 compliance controls are associated with this Policy definition 'Kubernetes cluster containers should only use allowed AppArmor profiles' (511f5417-5d12-434d-ab2e-816901e72a5e)
Control Domain Control Name MetadataId Category Title Owner Requirements Description Info Policy#
Azure_Security_Benchmark_v2.0 PV-2 Azure_Security_Benchmark_v2.0_PV-2 Azure Security Benchmark PV-2 Posture and Vulnerability Management Sustain secure configurations for Azure services Customer Use Azure Security Center to monitor your configuration baseline and use Azure Policy [deny] and [deploy if not exist] rule to enforce secure configuration across Azure compute resources, including VMs, containers, and others. Understand Azure Policy effects: https://docs.microsoft.com/azure/governance/policy/concepts/effects Create and manage policies to enforce compliance: https://docs.microsoft.com/azure/governance/policy/tutorials/create-and-manage n/a link 19
Azure_Security_Benchmark_v3.0 PV-2 Azure_Security_Benchmark_v3.0_PV-2 Microsoft cloud security benchmark PV-2 Posture and Vulnerability Management Audit and enforce secure configurations Shared **Security Principle:** Continuously monitor and alert when there is a deviation from the defined configuration baseline. Enforce the desired configuration according to the baseline configuration by denying the non-compliant configuration or deploy a configuration. **Azure Guidance:** Use Microsoft Defender for Cloud to configure Azure Policy to audit and enforce configurations of your Azure resources. Use Azure Monitor to create alerts when there is a configuration deviation detected on the resources. Use Azure Policy [deny] and [deploy if not exist] rule to enforce secure configuration across Azure resources. For resource configuration audit and enforcement not supported by Azure Policy, you may need to write your own scripts or use third-party tooling to implement the configuration audit and enforcement. **Implementation and additional context:** Understand Azure Policy effects: https://docs.microsoft.com/azure/governance/policy/concepts/effects Create and manage policies to enforce compliance: https://docs.microsoft.com/azure/governance/policy/tutorials/create-and-manage Get compliance data of Azure resources: https://docs.microsoft.com/azure/governance/policy/how-to/get-compliance-data n/a link 27
C.04.7 - Evaluated C.04.7 - Evaluated 404 not found n/a n/a 55
Canada_Federal_PBMM_3-1-2020 AC_2(4) Canada_Federal_PBMM_3-1-2020_AC_2(4) Canada Federal PBMM 3-1-2020 AC 2(4) Account Management Account Management | Automated Audit Actions Shared 1. The information system automatically audits account creation, modification, enabling, disabling, and removal actions, and notifies responsible managers. 2. Related controls: AU-2, AU-12. To ensure accountability and transparency within the information system. 52
Canada_Federal_PBMM_3-1-2020 CP_10(2) Canada_Federal_PBMM_3-1-2020_CP_10(2) Canada Federal PBMM 3-1-2020 CP 10(2) Information System Recovery and Reconstitution Information System Recovery and Reconstitution | Transaction Recovery Shared The information system implements transaction recovery for systems that are transaction-based. To minimise the impact on business operations and preventing data loss or corruption. 10
Canada_Federal_PBMM_3-1-2020 CP_10(4) Canada_Federal_PBMM_3-1-2020_CP_10(4) Canada Federal PBMM 3-1-2020 CP 10(4) Information System Recovery and Reconstitution Information System Recovery and Reconstitution | Restore within Time Period Shared The organization provides the capability to restore information system components within organization-defined restoration time-periods from configuration-controlled and integrity-protected information representing a known, operational state for the components. To minimise downtime and ensuring business continuity. 10
Canada_Federal_PBMM_3-1-2020 CP_2(3) Canada_Federal_PBMM_3-1-2020_CP_2(3) Canada Federal PBMM 3-1-2020 CP 2(3) Contingency Plan Contingency Plan | Resume Essential Missions / Business Functions Shared The organization plans for the resumption of essential missions and business functions within 24 hours of contingency plan activation. To ensure that the organization plans for the resumption of essential missions and business functions within 24 hours of activating the contingency plan. 10
Canada_Federal_PBMM_3-1-2020 CP_2(4) Canada_Federal_PBMM_3-1-2020_CP_2(4) Canada Federal PBMM 3-1-2020 CP 2(4) Contingency Plan Contingency Plan | Resume All Missions / Business Functions Shared The organization plans for the resumption of all missions and business functions within organization-defined time period of contingency plan activation. To ensure that the organization plans for the resumption of all missions and business functions within an organization-defined time period of contingency plan activation. 10
Canada_Federal_PBMM_3-1-2020 CP_2(5) Canada_Federal_PBMM_3-1-2020_CP_2(5) Canada Federal PBMM 3-1-2020 CP 2(5) Contingency Plan Contingency Plan | Continue Essential Missions / Business Functions Shared The organization plans for the continuance of essential missions and business functions with little or no loss of operational continuity and sustains that continuity until full information system restoration at primary processing and/or storage sites. To minimise downtime, mitigate potential financial losses, maintain customer trust, and uphold critical services or functions. 10
Canada_Federal_PBMM_3-1-2020 CP_2(6) Canada_Federal_PBMM_3-1-2020_CP_2(6) Canada Federal PBMM 3-1-2020 CP 2(6) Contingency Plan Contingency Plan | Alternate Processing / Storage Site Shared The organization plans for the transfer of essential missions and business functions to alternate processing and/or storage sites with little or no loss of operational continuity and sustains that continuity through information system restoration to primary processing and/or storage sites. To minimise downtime and ensure that critical services can continue uninterrupted until full restoration is achieved. 10
CMMC_2.0_L2 CM.L2-3.4.1 CMMC_2.0_L2_CM.L2-3.4.1 404 not found n/a n/a 25
CMMC_2.0_L2 CM.L2-3.4.2 CMMC_2.0_L2_CM.L2-3.4.2 404 not found n/a n/a 27
CMMC_L2_v1.9.0 CM.L2_3.4.8 CMMC_L2_v1.9.0_CM.L2_3.4.8 Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) Level 2 v1.9.0 CM.L2 3.4.8 Configuration Management Application Execution Policy Shared Apply deny by exception (blacklisting) policy to prevent the use of unauthorized software or deny all, permit by exception (whitelisting) policy to allow the execution of authorized software. To reduce the risk of malware infections or unauthorized access. 5
EU_2555_(NIS2)_2022 EU_2555_(NIS2)_2022_11 EU_2555_(NIS2)_2022_11 EU 2022/2555 (NIS2) 2022 11 Requirements, technical capabilities and tasks of CSIRTs Shared n/a Outlines the requirements, technical capabilities, and tasks of CSIRTs. 68
EU_2555_(NIS2)_2022 EU_2555_(NIS2)_2022_12 EU_2555_(NIS2)_2022_12 EU 2022/2555 (NIS2) 2022 12 Coordinated vulnerability disclosure and a European vulnerability database Shared n/a Establishes a coordinated vulnerability disclosure process and a European vulnerability database. 66
EU_2555_(NIS2)_2022 EU_2555_(NIS2)_2022_21 EU_2555_(NIS2)_2022_21 EU 2022/2555 (NIS2) 2022 21 Cybersecurity risk-management measures Shared n/a Requires essential and important entities to take appropriate measures to manage cybersecurity risks. 193
EU_2555_(NIS2)_2022 EU_2555_(NIS2)_2022_29 EU_2555_(NIS2)_2022_29 EU 2022/2555 (NIS2) 2022 29 Cybersecurity information-sharing arrangements Shared n/a Allows entities to exchange relevant cybersecurity information on a voluntary basis. 66
FedRAMP_High_R4 CM-6 FedRAMP_High_R4_CM-6 FedRAMP High CM-6 Configuration Management Configuration Settings Shared n/a The organization: a. Establishes and documents configuration settings for information technology products employed within the information system using [Assignment: organization-defined security configuration checklists] that reflect the most restrictive mode consistent with operational requirements; b. Implements the configuration settings; c. Identifies, documents, and approves any deviations from established configuration settings for [Assignment: organization-defined information system components] based on [Assignment: organization-defined operational requirements]; and d. Monitors and controls changes to the configuration settings in accordance with organizational policies and procedures. Supplemental Guidance: Configuration settings are the set of parameters that can be changed in hardware, software, or firmware components of the information system that affect the security posture and/or functionality of the system. Information technology products for which security- related configuration settings can be defined include, for example, mainframe computers, servers (e.g., database, electronic mail, authentication, web, proxy, file, domain name), workstations, input/output devices (e.g., scanners, copiers, and printers), network components (e.g., firewalls, routers, gateways, voice and data switches, wireless access points, network appliances, sensors), operating systems, middleware, and applications. Security-related parameters are those parameters impacting the security state of information systems including the parameters required to satisfy other security control requirements. Security-related parameters include, for example: (i) registry settings; (ii) account, file, directory permission settings; and (iii) settings for functions, ports, protocols, services, and remote connections. Organizations establish organization-wide configuration settings and subsequently derive specific settings for information systems. The established settings become part of the systems configuration baseline. Common secure configurations (also referred to as security configuration checklists, lockdown and hardening guides, security reference guides, security technical implementation guides) provide recognized, standardized, and established benchmarks that stipulate secure configuration settings for specific information technology platforms/products and instructions for configuring those information system components to meet operational requirements. Common secure configurations can be developed by a variety of organizations including, for example, information technology product developers, manufacturers, vendors, consortia, academia, industry, federal agencies, and other organizations in the public and private sectors. Common secure configurations include the United States Government Configuration Baseline (USGCB) which affects the implementation of CM-6 and other controls such as AC-19 and CM-7. The Security Content Automation Protocol (SCAP) and the defined standards within the protocol (e.g., Common Configuration Enumeration) provide an effective method to uniquely identify, track, and control configuration settings. OMB establishes federal policy on configuration requirements for federal information systems. Related controls: AC-19, CM-2, CM-3, CM-7, SI-4. References: OMB Memoranda 07-11, 07-18, 08-22; NIST Special Publications 800-70, 800-128; Web: http://nvd.nist.gov, http://checklists.nist.gov, http://www.nsa.gov. link 23
FedRAMP_Moderate_R4 CM-6 FedRAMP_Moderate_R4_CM-6 FedRAMP Moderate CM-6 Configuration Management Configuration Settings Shared n/a The organization: a. Establishes and documents configuration settings for information technology products employed within the information system using [Assignment: organization-defined security configuration checklists] that reflect the most restrictive mode consistent with operational requirements; b. Implements the configuration settings; c. Identifies, documents, and approves any deviations from established configuration settings for [Assignment: organization-defined information system components] based on [Assignment: organization-defined operational requirements]; and d. Monitors and controls changes to the configuration settings in accordance with organizational policies and procedures. Supplemental Guidance: Configuration settings are the set of parameters that can be changed in hardware, software, or firmware components of the information system that affect the security posture and/or functionality of the system. Information technology products for which security- related configuration settings can be defined include, for example, mainframe computers, servers (e.g., database, electronic mail, authentication, web, proxy, file, domain name), workstations, input/output devices (e.g., scanners, copiers, and printers), network components (e.g., firewalls, routers, gateways, voice and data switches, wireless access points, network appliances, sensors), operating systems, middleware, and applications. Security-related parameters are those parameters impacting the security state of information systems including the parameters required to satisfy other security control requirements. Security-related parameters include, for example: (i) registry settings; (ii) account, file, directory permission settings; and (iii) settings for functions, ports, protocols, services, and remote connections. Organizations establish organization-wide configuration settings and subsequently derive specific settings for information systems. The established settings become part of the systems configuration baseline. Common secure configurations (also referred to as security configuration checklists, lockdown and hardening guides, security reference guides, security technical implementation guides) provide recognized, standardized, and established benchmarks that stipulate secure configuration settings for specific information technology platforms/products and instructions for configuring those information system components to meet operational requirements. Common secure configurations can be developed by a variety of organizations including, for example, information technology product developers, manufacturers, vendors, consortia, academia, industry, federal agencies, and other organizations in the public and private sectors. Common secure configurations include the United States Government Configuration Baseline (USGCB) which affects the implementation of CM-6 and other controls such as AC-19 and CM-7. The Security Content Automation Protocol (SCAP) and the defined standards within the protocol (e.g., Common Configuration Enumeration) provide an effective method to uniquely identify, track, and control configuration settings. OMB establishes federal policy on configuration requirements for federal information systems. Related controls: AC-19, CM-2, CM-3, CM-7, SI-4. References: OMB Memoranda 07-11, 07-18, 08-22; NIST Special Publications 800-70, 800-128; Web: http://nvd.nist.gov, http://checklists.nist.gov, http://www.nsa.gov. link 23
NIST_SP_800-171_R2_3 .4.1 NIST_SP_800-171_R2_3.4.1 NIST SP 800-171 R2 3.4.1 Configuration Management Establish and maintain baseline configurations and inventories of organizational systems (including hardware, software, firmware, and documentation) throughout the respective system development life cycles. Shared Microsoft and the customer share responsibilities for implementing this requirement. Baseline configurations are documented, formally reviewed, and agreed-upon specifications for systems or configuration items within those systems. Baseline configurations serve as a basis for future builds, releases, and changes to systems. Baseline configurations include information about system components (e.g., standard software packages installed on workstations, notebook computers, servers, network components, or mobile devices; current version numbers and update and patch information on operating systems and applications; and configuration settings and parameters), network topology, and the logical placement of those components within the system architecture. Baseline configurations of systems also reflect the current enterprise architecture. Maintaining effective baseline configurations requires creating new baselines as organizational systems change over time. Baseline configuration maintenance includes reviewing and updating the baseline configuration when changes are made based on security risks and deviations from the established baseline configuration. Organizations can implement centralized system component inventories that include components from multiple organizational systems. In such situations, organizations ensure that the resulting inventories include system-specific information required for proper component accountability (e.g., system association, system owner). Information deemed necessary for effective accountability of system components includes hardware inventory specifications, software license information, software version numbers, component owners, and for networked components or devices, machine names and network addresses. Inventory specifications include manufacturer, device type, model, serial number, and physical location. [SP 800-128] provides guidance on security-focused configuration management. link 31
NIST_SP_800-171_R2_3 .4.2 NIST_SP_800-171_R2_3.4.2 NIST SP 800-171 R2 3.4.2 Configuration Management Establish and enforce security configuration settings for information technology products employed in organizational systems. Shared Microsoft and the customer share responsibilities for implementing this requirement. Configuration settings are the set of parameters that can be changed in hardware, software, or firmware components of the system that affect the security posture or functionality of the system. Information technology products for which security-related configuration settings can be defined include mainframe computers, servers, workstations, input and output devices (e.g., scanners, copiers, and printers), network components (e.g., firewalls, routers, gateways, voice and data switches, wireless access points, network appliances, sensors), operating systems, middleware, and applications. Security parameters are those parameters impacting the security state of systems including the parameters required to satisfy other security requirements. Security parameters include: registry settings; account, file, directory permission settings; and settings for functions, ports, protocols, and remote connections. Organizations establish organization-wide configuration settings and subsequently derive specific configuration settings for systems. The established settings become part of the systems configuration baseline. Common secure configurations (also referred to as security configuration checklists, lockdown and hardening guides, security reference guides, security technical implementation guides) provide recognized, standardized, and established benchmarks that stipulate secure configuration settings for specific information technology platforms/products and instructions for configuring those system components to meet operational requirements. Common secure configurations can be developed by a variety of organizations including information technology product developers, manufacturers, vendors, consortia, academia, industry, federal agencies, and other organizations in the public and private sectors. [SP 800-70] and [SP 800-128] provide guidance on security configuration settings. link 25
NIST_SP_800-171_R3_3 .4.8 NIST_SP_800-171_R3_3.4.8 404 not found n/a n/a 5
NIST_SP_800-53_R4 CM-6 NIST_SP_800-53_R4_CM-6 NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 4 CM-6 Configuration Management Configuration Settings Shared n/a The organization: a. Establishes and documents configuration settings for information technology products employed within the information system using [Assignment: organization-defined security configuration checklists] that reflect the most restrictive mode consistent with operational requirements; b. Implements the configuration settings; c. Identifies, documents, and approves any deviations from established configuration settings for [Assignment: organization-defined information system components] based on [Assignment: organization-defined operational requirements]; and d. Monitors and controls changes to the configuration settings in accordance with organizational policies and procedures. Supplemental Guidance: Configuration settings are the set of parameters that can be changed in hardware, software, or firmware components of the information system that affect the security posture and/or functionality of the system. Information technology products for which security- related configuration settings can be defined include, for example, mainframe computers, servers (e.g., database, electronic mail, authentication, web, proxy, file, domain name), workstations, input/output devices (e.g., scanners, copiers, and printers), network components (e.g., firewalls, routers, gateways, voice and data switches, wireless access points, network appliances, sensors), operating systems, middleware, and applications. Security-related parameters are those parameters impacting the security state of information systems including the parameters required to satisfy other security control requirements. Security-related parameters include, for example: (i) registry settings; (ii) account, file, directory permission settings; and (iii) settings for functions, ports, protocols, services, and remote connections. Organizations establish organization-wide configuration settings and subsequently derive specific settings for information systems. The established settings become part of the systems configuration baseline. Common secure configurations (also referred to as security configuration checklists, lockdown and hardening guides, security reference guides, security technical implementation guides) provide recognized, standardized, and established benchmarks that stipulate secure configuration settings for specific information technology platforms/products and instructions for configuring those information system components to meet operational requirements. Common secure configurations can be developed by a variety of organizations including, for example, information technology product developers, manufacturers, vendors, consortia, academia, industry, federal agencies, and other organizations in the public and private sectors. Common secure configurations include the United States Government Configuration Baseline (USGCB) which affects the implementation of CM-6 and other controls such as AC-19 and CM-7. The Security Content Automation Protocol (SCAP) and the defined standards within the protocol (e.g., Common Configuration Enumeration) provide an effective method to uniquely identify, track, and control configuration settings. OMB establishes federal policy on configuration requirements for federal information systems. Related controls: AC-19, CM-2, CM-3, CM-7, SI-4. References: OMB Memoranda 07-11, 07-18, 08-22; NIST Special Publications 800-70, 800-128; Web: http://nvd.nist.gov, http://checklists.nist.gov, http://www.nsa.gov. link 23
NIST_SP_800-53_R5 CM-6 NIST_SP_800-53_R5_CM-6 NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-6 Configuration Management Configuration Settings Shared n/a a. Establish and document configuration settings for components employed within the system that reflect the most restrictive mode consistent with operational requirements using [Assignment: organization-defined common secure configurations]; b. Implement the configuration settings; c. Identify, document, and approve any deviations from established configuration settings for [Assignment: organization-defined system components] based on [Assignment: organization-defined operational requirements]; and d. Monitor and control changes to the configuration settings in accordance with organizational policies and procedures. link 23
NZISM_v3.7 22.1.26.C.01. NZISM_v3.7_22.1.26.C.01. NZISM v3.7 22.1.26.C.01. Cloud Computing 22.1.26.C.01. - ensure safety of data. Shared n/a Agencies MUST develop and implement a backup, recovery and archiving plan and supporting procedures. 11
NZISM_v3.7 6.4.6.C.01. NZISM_v3.7_6.4.6.C.01. NZISM v3.7 6.4.6.C.01. Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery 6.4.6.C.01. - enhance operational resilience. Shared n/a Agencies SHOULD: 1.Identify vital records; 2. backup all vital records; 3. store copies of critical information, with associated documented recovery procedures, offsite and secured in accordance with the requirements for the highest 4. 4. classification of the information; and 5. test backup and restoration processes regularly to confirm their effectiveness. 13
PCI_DSS_v4.0.1 10.3.4 PCI_DSS_v4.0.1_10.3.4 PCI DSS v4.0.1 10.3.4 Log and Monitor All Access to System Components and Cardholder Data Log Integrity Monitoring Shared n/a File integrity monitoring or change-detection mechanisms is used on audit logs to ensure that existing log data cannot be changed without generating alerts. 28
PCI_DSS_v4.0.1 11.5.2 PCI_DSS_v4.0.1_11.5.2 PCI DSS v4.0.1 11.5.2 Test Security of Systems and Networks Regularly Change-Detection Mechanism Deployment Shared n/a A change-detection mechanism (for example, file integrity monitoring tools) is deployed as follows: • To alert personnel to unauthorized modification (including changes, additions, and deletions) of critical files. • To perform critical file comparisons at least once weekly. 31
SOC_2 CC6.8 SOC_2_CC6.8 SOC 2 Type 2 CC6.8 Logical and Physical Access Controls Prevent or detect against unauthorized or malicious software Shared The customer is responsible for implementing this recommendation. Restricts Application and Software Installation — The ability to install applications and software is restricted to authorized individuals. • Detects Unauthorized Changes to Software and Configuration Parameters — Processes are in place to detect changes to software and configuration parameters that may be indicative of unauthorized or malicious software. • Uses a Defined Change Control Process — A management-defined change control process is used for the implementation of software. • Uses Antivirus and Anti-Malware Software — Antivirus and anti-malware software is implemented and maintained to provide for the interception or detection and remediation of malware. • Scans Information Assets from Outside the Entity for Malware and Other Unauthorized Software — Procedures are in place to scan information assets that have been transferred or returned to the entity’s custody for malware and other unauthorized software and to remove any items detected prior to its implementation on the network. 47
SOC_2 CC8.1 SOC_2_CC8.1 SOC 2 Type 2 CC8.1 Change Management Changes to infrastructure, data, and software Shared The customer is responsible for implementing this recommendation. Manages Changes Throughout the System Life Cycle — A process for managing system changes throughout the life cycle of the system and its components (infrastructure, data, software, and procedures) is used to support system availability and processing integrity. • Authorizes Changes — A process is in place to authorize system changes prior to development. • Designs and Develops Changes — A process is in place to design and develop system changes. • Documents Changes — A process is in place to document system changes to support ongoing maintenance of the system and to support system users in performing their responsibilities. • Tracks System Changes — A process is in place to track system changes prior to implementation. • Configures Software — A process is in place to select and implement the configuration parameters used to control the functionality of software. • Tests System Changes — A process is in place to test system changes prior to implementation. • Approves System Changes — A process is in place to approve system changes prior to implementation. • Deploys System Changes — A process is in place to implement system changes. • Identifies and Evaluates System Changes — Objectives affected by system changes are identified and the ability of the modified system to meet the objectives is evaluated throughout the system development life cycle. • Identifies Changes in Infrastructure, Data, Software, and Procedures Required to Remediate Incidents — Changes in infrastructure, data, software, and procedures required to remediate incidents to continue to meet objectives are identified and the change process is initiated upon identification. • Creates Baseline Configuration of IT Technology — A baseline configuration of IT and control systems is created and maintained. • Provides for Changes Necessary in Emergency Situations — A process is in place for authorizing, designing, testing, approving, and implementing changes necessary in emergency situations (that is, changes that need to be implemented in an urgent time frame). Additional points of focus that apply only in an engagement using the trust services criteria for confidentiality: • Protects Confidential Information — The entity protects confidential information during system design, development, testing, implementation, and change processes to meet the entity’s objectives related to confidentiality. Additional points of focus that apply only in an engagement using the trust services criteria for privacy: • Protects Personal Information — The entity protects personal information during system design, development, testing, implementation, and change processes to meet the entity’s objectives related to privacy. 52
SOC_2023 CC2.3 SOC_2023_CC2.3 SOC 2023 CC2.3 Information and Communication Facilitate effective internal communication. Shared n/a Entity to communicate with external parties regarding matters affecting the functioning of internal control. 218
SOC_2023 CC5.3 SOC_2023_CC5.3 SOC 2023 CC5.3 Control Activities Maintain alignment with organizational objectives and regulatory requirements. Shared n/a Entity deploys control activities through policies that establish what is expected and in procedures that put policies into action by establishing Policies and Procedures to Support Deployment of Management’s Directives, Responsibility and Accountability for Executing Policies and Procedures, perform tasks in a timely manner, taking corrective actions, perform using competent personnel and reassess policies and procedures. 229
SOC_2023 CC7.4 SOC_2023_CC7.4 SOC 2023 CC7.4 Systems Operations Effectively manage security incidents, minimize their impact, and protect assets, operations, and reputation. Shared n/a The entity responds to identified security incidents by: a. Executing a defined incident-response program to understand, contain, remediate, and communicate security incidents by assigning roles and responsibilities; b. Establishing procedures to contain security incidents; c. Mitigating ongoing security incidents, End Threats Posed by Security Incidents; d. Restoring operations; e. Developing and Implementing Communication Protocols for Security Incidents; f. Obtains Understanding of Nature of Incident and Determines Containment Strategy; g. Remediation Identified Vulnerabilities; h. Communicating Remediation Activities; and, i. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Incident Response and periodic incident evaluations. 213
SWIFT_CSCF_2024 2.1 SWIFT_CSCF_2024_2.1 SWIFT Customer Security Controls Framework 2024 2.1 Risk Management Internal Data Flow Security Shared The protection of internal data flows safeguards against unintended disclosure, modification, and access of the data while in transit. To ensure the confidentiality, integrity, and authenticity of application data flows between ’user’s Swift-related components. 48
SWIFT_CSCF_2024 6.2 SWIFT_CSCF_2024_6.2 SWIFT Customer Security Controls Framework 2024 6.2 Risk Management Software Integrity Shared Software integrity checks provide a detective control against unexpected modification to operational software. To ensure the software integrity of the Swift-related components and act upon results. 16
SWIFT_CSCF_2024 6.3 SWIFT_CSCF_2024_6.3 SWIFT Customer Security Controls Framework 2024 6.3 Risk Management Database Integrity Shared Database integrity checks allow unexpected modification to records stored within the database to be detected. To ensure the integrity of the database records for the Swift messaging interface or the customer connector and act upon results. 16
Initiatives usage
Initiative DisplayName Initiative Id Initiative Category State Type polSet in AzUSGov
[Deprecated]: Azure Security Benchmark v2 bb522ac1-bc39-4957-b194-429bcd3bcb0b Regulatory Compliance Deprecated BuiltIn true
[Preview]: CMMC 2.0 Level 2 4e50fd13-098b-3206-61d6-d1d78205cb45 Regulatory Compliance Preview BuiltIn true
Canada Federal PBMM 3-1-2020 f8f5293d-df94-484a-a3e7-6b422a999d91 Regulatory Compliance GA BuiltIn unknown
Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) Level 2 v1.9.0 a4087154-2edb-4329-b56a-1cc986807f3c Regulatory Compliance GA BuiltIn unknown
EU 2022/2555 (NIS2) 2022 42346945-b531-41d8-9e46-f95057672e88 Regulatory Compliance GA BuiltIn unknown
FedRAMP High d5264498-16f4-418a-b659-fa7ef418175f Regulatory Compliance GA BuiltIn true
FedRAMP Moderate e95f5a9f-57ad-4d03-bb0b-b1d16db93693 Regulatory Compliance GA BuiltIn true
Microsoft cloud security benchmark 1f3afdf9-d0c9-4c3d-847f-89da613e70a8 Security Center GA BuiltIn true
NIST 800-171 R3 38916c43-6876-4971-a4b1-806aa7e55ccc Regulatory Compliance GA BuiltIn unknown
NIST SP 800-171 Rev. 2 03055927-78bd-4236-86c0-f36125a10dc9 Regulatory Compliance GA BuiltIn true
NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 4 cf25b9c1-bd23-4eb6-bd2c-f4f3ac644a5f Regulatory Compliance GA BuiltIn true
NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 179d1daa-458f-4e47-8086-2a68d0d6c38f Regulatory Compliance GA BuiltIn true
NL BIO Cloud Theme 6ce73208-883e-490f-a2ac-44aac3b3687f Regulatory Compliance GA BuiltIn unknown
NL BIO Cloud Theme V2 d8b2ffbe-c6a8-4622-965d-4ade11d1d2ee Regulatory Compliance GA BuiltIn unknown
NZISM v3.7 4476df0a-18ab-4bfe-b6ad-cccae1cf320f Regulatory Compliance GA BuiltIn unknown
PCI DSS v4.0.1 a06d5deb-24aa-4991-9d58-fa7563154e31 Regulatory Compliance GA BuiltIn unknown
SOC 2 Type 2 4054785f-702b-4a98-9215-009cbd58b141 Regulatory Compliance GA BuiltIn true
SOC 2023 53ad89f5-8542-49e9-ba81-1cbd686e0d52 Regulatory Compliance GA BuiltIn unknown
SWIFT Customer Security Controls Framework 2024 7499005e-df5a-45d9-810f-041cf346678c Regulatory Compliance GA BuiltIn unknown
History
Date/Time (UTC ymd) (i) Change type Change detail
2024-08-09 18:17:47 change Minor (6.1.1 > 6.2.0)
2023-06-26 17:52:13 change Patch (6.1.0 > 6.1.1)
2023-05-01 17:41:52 change Minor (6.0.1 > 6.1.0)
2022-10-21 16:42:13 change Patch (6.0.0 > 6.0.1)
2022-09-19 17:41:40 change Major (5.0.0 > 6.0.0)
2022-07-01 16:32:34 change Major (4.2.1 > 5.0.0)
2022-06-17 16:31:08 change Patch (4.2.0 > 4.2.1)
2022-04-29 18:06:01 change Minor (4.1.0 > 4.2.0)
2022-04-01 20:29:14 change Minor (4.0.3 > 4.1.0)
2022-01-21 21:53:22 change Patch (4.0.2 > 4.0.3)
2021-12-06 22:17:57 change Patch (4.0.1 > 4.0.2)
2021-09-08 15:39:57 change Patch (4.0.0 > 4.0.1)
2021-08-30 14:27:30 change Major (3.0.0 > 4.0.0)
2021-03-02 15:11:40 change Major (2.0.1 > 3.0.0)
2020-12-11 15:42:52 change Major (1.0.1 > 2.0.1)
2020-09-15 14:06:41 change Previous DisplayName: [Preview]: Kubernetes cluster containers should only use allowed AppArmor profiles
2020-07-08 14:28:08 add 511f5417-5d12-434d-ab2e-816901e72a5e
JSON compare
compare mode: version left: version right:
JSON
api-version=2021-06-01
EPAC